πŸ’°Web3 Cost Advantage

Platform lenders like Shopify Capital and Stripe Capital charge 20-50% APR[54][55][56]. Not because borrowers are riskyβ€”but because traditional financial infrastructure and VC-backed capital are expensive. Here's where those costs actually go, and how crypto infrastructure changes the equation.


The Cost Breakdown: Where 25% APR Goes

When a platform lender charges 25% APR for a small business loan, here's the actual breakdown:

Component
Percentage
What It Covers

Cost of Capital

8-10%

VC equity demanding 20-30% returns[70] + debt facilities at 12-15%[73]

Operating Costs

3-5%

ACH rails, settlement delays, reconciliation teams, compliance systems[68][72]

Default Risk Premium

10-13%

Actual loan losses (OnDeck: 13.6% charge-off rate[74])

Profit Margin

2-5%

Sustainable operations (industry avg: ~10%[75])

Total APR

23-33%

Average: ~25% APR

Key insight: About 11-15 percentage points (nearly half the total rate) go to infrastructure and capital costsβ€”not covering defaults.


Why High Rates Don't Mean High Profits

If costs are so high, are lenders making huge profits? No. Many charge 20-50% APR and still struggle.

Recent fintech lender struggles:

  • Clearco: Valuation dropped 90% (from $2B to $200M), laid off 72% of staff, both co-founders exited[76]

  • Wayflyer: Lost €40.9M in 2023, only achieving monthly profitability by October 2023[77]

  • Affirm: On pace to lose $800M in fiscal 2024, analysts predict unprofitability through 2026[78]

  • Uncapped: Completely abandoned RBF model in 2024, cited structural problems[79]

Why embedded lenders succeed: Shopify and Stripe work because they see every transaction[80], have zero customer acquisition cost[81], and deduct repayments directly from sales[82]. Standalone lenders can't compete without these advantages.

Between 2022-2024, fintech lending investment dropped to $51.9Bβ€”the lowest since 2020[83]. The infrastructure cost crisis is real.


Web3 Cost Advantage

LendFriend solves what platform lenders couldn't: capital costs and infrastructure costs.

Understanding Capital Structure

Platform Lenders (Complex Capital Stack):

  • Raise $10M VC equity (VCs want 20-30% returns[70] to make investment worthwhile)

  • Borrow $50M from debt facilities at 12-15%[73]

  • Must charge borrowers enough to: pay 12-15% debt interest + generate VC returns + cover operations + defaults

  • Result: charge 25% APR, but only ~3% ends up as actual profit

LendFriend (Direct Lending):

  • Community lenders provide capital directly (no VC, no debt facility)

  • Phase 0: 0% interest loans to prove social trust works

  • Phase 1-2: Lenders earn yield directly from borrower payments (typically 8-12%)

  • No debt facility fees on top of lender yields

  • No VC return pressure forcing higher rates

  • Result: Phase 1-2 charge 12-17% APR, lenders get better risk-adjusted returns

The Difference: Platform lenders pay 12-15% to borrow money, THEN pay that borrowed money to lenders. We skip the middleman.


Visual Breakdown: Where Your APR Goes

Savings Breakdown

Component
Platform Lenders
LendFriend
Savings

πŸ’° Capital Structure

VC pressure + debt facility overhead

Direct P2P lending

5-8pp*

βš™οΈ Infrastructure

ACH rails, manual ops, $500K-$2.5M launch[68][72]

Stablecoins, smart contracts

2-3pp*

🀝 Social Trust

Cashflow only

Cashflow + social graph

1-2pp*

* Estimated savings based on cost structure analysisβ€”will be validated with actual data

Key insight: Community lenders may earn SIMILAR yields (8-12%) to what debt facilities charge (12-15%), but borrowers pay less because there's no VC return pressure or debt facility overhead on top.


The Math: 12-17% APR Instead of 25%

Starting from a 25% APR platform loan:

  • Minus 5-8% (community capital at 0% cost vs. VC-backed capital)

  • Minus 2-3% (instant settlement, smart contract automation)

  • Minus 1-2% (social trust reducing defaultsβ€”requires proof)

  • Plus 2-5% (maintaining sustainable profit margins)

Result: 12-17% APR for similar borrower risk profile

Note: This is a cost structure model based on industry data. Actual APR ranges will be refined as we collect operational data in Phase 1.

This isn't charityβ€”it's infrastructure arbitrage. Same borrowers, same default risk, different payment rails and capital structure.


Why This Works Now

Five years ago, this wasn't possible. Today, the infrastructure converged:

  1. Stablecoins reached $305B supply with $27.6T transfer volume[57]

  2. Social protocols emerging: Farcaster (1M+ users[65]), Bluesky (20M+ users[66]) prove crypto-native identity can gain traction

  3. Smart contracts proven at scale: $50B+ collateralized lending[62]

  4. Oracle networks and ZK proofs enable secure platform data access (Shopify, Stripe, Coinbase Commerce)

All the pieces exist for the first time. We're assembling them for uncollateralized lending.


Learn More

Last updated