β Non-Custodial: User controls keys via CDP smart wallet
β Session Limits: On-chain enforcement of max amounts
β οΈ Centralized Calculation: Backend trusted for revenue data
β οΈ Web2 Data Source: Stripe/Square webhooks (off-chain)
Phase 2: Viable Auto-Deduction Plans
Plan A: Chainlink Automation (Recommended)
Best for: Production deployment with decentralized triggers
Architecture
Replace centralized backend with Chainlink Keeper network that automatically checks for repayment conditions.
Revenue Oracle Integration
Backend (Off-Chain Oracle Worker)
Benefits
β Decentralized trigger mechanism (Chainlink Keeper network) β Transparent revenue data on-chain β Multiple oracle operators can submit data (reduces single point of failure) β Auto-executes when conditions met
Drawbacks
β οΈ Still requires trusted oracle for Stripe data β οΈ Oracle operator can submit false revenue data β οΈ Gas costs for Chainlink upkeep
Cost Estimate
Chainlink Automation: ~$5-20/month depending on check frequency
Oracle submissions: ~$1-5 per submission (hourly = ~$150/month)
Plan B: Multi-Signature Backend Control
Best for: MVP with enhanced security and transparency
Architecture
Backend proposes repayments, but requires multiple signatures to execute.
Backend Integration
Auditor Dashboard
Benefits
β Transparent on-chain proposal system β Multiple parties verify calculations β Borrower can approve/reject β Auditor adds independent verification β All data logged on-chain
Drawbacks
β οΈ Slower (requires multiple signatures) β οΈ Still requires trusted backend and auditor β οΈ More gas costs (multiple transactions)
Plan C: On-Chain Revenue Attestations
Best for: High-trust merchants willing to self-report
Architecture
Merchants submit signed revenue statements directly on-chain.
Stripe Integration (Hypothetical)
Benefits
β Fully on-chain revenue data β Cryptographically verified by Stripe β No backend needed β Maximum transparency
Drawbacks
β Stripe doesn't support this (deal-breaker for now) β Would require partnership with Stripe/Square β Merchants must manually submit (friction)
Plan D: Crypto-Native Revenue (Full Decentralization)
Best for: Merchants accepting crypto payments only
β Fully trustless - no backend, no oracle β Instant - repayment on every sale β Transparent - all on-chain β No gas for borrower - customer pays gas
Drawbacks
β Only works for crypto-native merchants β Doesn't integrate with Stripe/Square β Customers must have crypto wallets
Comparison Matrix
Plan
Decentralization
Stripe Integration
Gas Costs
Implementation Complexity
Best For
A: Chainlink
ββββ
β Via Oracle
Medium
High
Production
B: Multi-Sig
βββ
β Direct
Medium
Medium
MVP with security
C: Attestations
βββββ
β Not supported
Low
Blocked
Future (if Stripe adds)
D: Crypto-Native
βββββ
β N/A
Low
Low
Crypto-only merchants
Recommended Implementation Path
Phase 2A: Multi-Sig Backend (Months 1-3)
Why: Quick to implement, adds transparency and security
Deploy multi-sig contract
Onboard independent auditor
Build auditor dashboard
Enable borrower approval/rejection
Phase 2B: Chainlink Integration (Months 4-6)
Why: Decentralized triggers, production-ready
Build Stripe Oracle contract
Set up Chainlink Automation
Deploy oracle worker (off-chain)
Migrate from multi-sig to Chainlink
Phase 2C: Hybrid Approach (Months 7+)
Why: Best of both worlds
Chainlink for automatic triggers
Multi-sig for large repayments (>$1K)
Crypto-native option for crypto merchants
Dispute mechanism for borrowers
Trust Minimization Strategy
Even with centralized components, you can minimize trust:
1. Transparent Logging
2. Dispute Mechanism
3. Rate Limiting
4. Emergency Stop
Conclusion
For Phase 2, we recommend:
Start with Plan B (Multi-Sig) for immediate security improvements
Transition to Plan A (Chainlink) for decentralized triggers
Keep Plan D (Crypto-Native) as option for crypto merchants
Monitor Plan C (Attestations) in case Stripe adds support
All plans maintain non-custodial architecture while improving decentralization of revenue verification and repayment triggers.